Case

Essentially, I am arguing that athletes are being exploited for economic gain. Universities are heavily profiting from college athletics, while the athletes themselves never see even a penny of the revenue they bring in. Yes, many athletes gain a free or discounted education, but many do not get to freely declare their majors or have the time needed to devote to more demanding majors. The reality of the situation is that less than 2% of student-athletes go on to play in professional leagues. The college athletic system is setting up many athletes for lackluster future or even worse, failure.
            Stanley Doughty was a defensive tackle for the University of South Carolina. Doughty forfeited his senior year of college to enter the NFL draft, 12-credits shy of a degree. Fortunately, he was drafted to play for the Kansas City Chiefs. Doughty entered the draft, despite 2 major injuries during his college career, because he was cleared to play by the Gamecocks team doctors. After his first injury, he was left temporarily paralyzed and after undergoing an MRI was diagnosed with mild spinal stenosis. His second injury, that also left him temporarily paralyzed, did not even come with an MRI. Doughty rested in the locker room for five minutes and finished the game. Most importantly, South Carolina won. After being examined by the Kansas City Chief’s team doctors, he was told that his X-rays revealed a career ending spinal injury that could leave him paralyzed with just one wrong hit. Doughty was immediately dropped from the Chiefs. Doughty was left jobless without a college degree or insurance, needing surgery, sans support from the team that let his injury slide for a victory.
            Stanley Doughty’s story is a perfect example of how college athletic programs are doing their athletes a disservice. Not only did the team doctors allow Doughty to return to play in less than tip-top shape, but they even went as far to not give him a full examination after his second injury. According to doctors who reexamined his X-rays later on, they found that there had been substantial changes to his spine from the scans taken after his first injury, to the present. South Carolina did not stop at putting Doughty’s life in danger, but allowed him to enter the draft, thinking he was physically eligible to play in the NFL. He sacrificed his scholarships before he could earn a degree. After Doughty found out about his career-ending injury from the Chiefs doctors, South Carolina was not there to assist him in anyway. Sadly, there are many other stories like Stanley Doughty’s out there and they truly bring to light how universities put victories over players’ well-being and do not hold themselves accountable for any problems bad judgement clearly leads to.

Walsh, Meghan. “'I Trusted 'Em': When NCAA Schools Abandon Their Injured   Athletes.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 1 May 2013,   www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/05/i-trusted-em-when-ncaa-  schools-abandon-their-injured-athletes/275407/.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Business of Amateurs

Image
https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B01K90TE34/ref=atv_sr_def_c_unkc__1_1_1?sr=1-1&pageTypeIdSource=ASIN&pageTypeId=B01K90YZD8&qid=1587429432 The documentary starts with Scott Ross’ story. He was a  lineman for USC and carried on to play in the NFL. He claims to have experienced at least 12 concussions, as well as multiple times when he remember “shaking off” a hit and going back into the huddle. Ross has developed multiple mental health issues making it increasingly difficult to hold jobs and maintain relationships. His football career negatively impacted his life forever, ultimately passing away from an overdose.  During the early 1900s, President Roosevelt threatened to ban football unless it was made safe. As a response, the NCAA was formed to protect the health and welfare of the college athlete, but that view has drastically shifted. According to the documentary, football players in the FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) division are worth over $1...
Read more

Literature Review #1

Image
Citation: Carson II, Loftus C., and Michelle A. Rinehart. “The Big Business of College Game Day.” Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law , vol. 12, no. 1, Fall 2010, pp.1-12. < EBSCOhost ,search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=66688442&site=ehost-live.> Summary:             American colleges and universities once focused on educating young adults to be well-rounded, contribution members of society. Over a century later, college athletics has strayed from an all-inclusive, expanding horizons pastime and turned into high-stakes entertainment. Athletics were once used as tool to teach students the values of teamwork, dedication, discipline, and hard work. Now, athletic programs are viewed as beneficial to the institution, rather than the students and athletes.             Saturday game day became a way to esca...
Read more

Research Question

My current research questions focus on what college sports means for athletes. What is the real cost of college sports? How do athletes benefit and how do they suffer? How does team/athletic program culture lend into injury reporting? Are athletes really gaining enough to justify the sacrifices or are they being exploited for economic gain? Academic Sources: “At Risk: Are Unpaid College Athletes Exploited While Others Reap Millions?.” Knowledge@Wharton . The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 19 March, 2014. Web. 26 February, 2020 < https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/risk-unpaid-college-athletes-exploited-others-reap-millions/ > Edwards, Josh. “The Incompatibility of Sports and Higher Education.”   Academic Questions , vol. 32, no. 3, Sept. 2019, pp. 342–353.   EBSCOhost , doi:10.1007/s12129-019-09805-5. Geier, David. That's Gotta Hurt: the Injuries That Changed Sports Forever . ForeEdge, 2017. Houston, Me...
Read more